<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Equal Access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swissarmylibrarian.net/2007/02/01/equal-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swissarmylibrarian.net/2007/02/01/equal-access/</link>
	<description>or, The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Fear and Loathing at a Public Library Reference Desk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma</title>
		<link>http://www.swissarmylibrarian.net/2007/02/01/equal-access/#comment-20549</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swissarmylibrarian.net/?p=53#comment-20549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s helpful, thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s helpful, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Herzog</title>
		<link>http://www.swissarmylibrarian.net/2007/02/01/equal-access/#comment-20525</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swissarmylibrarian.net/?p=53#comment-20525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Emma: good question.  Since the topic is so broad, you almost have to have an equally-broad policy, and then apply it accordingly (and perhaps differently) to each individual situation.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chelmsfordlibrary.org/library_info/policies/2-8_computerusepolicy.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My library&#039;s policies are online&lt;/a&gt;, if that helps.

Our procedure, though (I think), is the important thing.  We always immediately respond to complaints - I go over to the &quot;offender&quot; and never accuse them of anything or ask to see their screen or anything like that.  I just tell them that someone complained about something they saw on their screen, that this is a public building, and so anything on computer screens must be appropriate for all ages.  Sometimes the person was watching YouTube music videos, or shopping for underwear or something online, but often the person apologizes and then leaves shortly thereafter.  Not ideal, but it seems to work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Emma: good question.  Since the topic is so broad, you almost have to have an equally-broad policy, and then apply it accordingly (and perhaps differently) to each individual situation.  <a href="http://www.chelmsfordlibrary.org/library_info/policies/2-8_computerusepolicy.html" rel="nofollow">My library&#8217;s policies are online</a>, if that helps.</p>
<p>Our procedure, though (I think), is the important thing.  We always immediately respond to complaints &#8211; I go over to the &#8220;offender&#8221; and never accuse them of anything or ask to see their screen or anything like that.  I just tell them that someone complained about something they saw on their screen, that this is a public building, and so anything on computer screens must be appropriate for all ages.  Sometimes the person was watching YouTube music videos, or shopping for underwear or something online, but often the person apologizes and then leaves shortly thereafter.  Not ideal, but it seems to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma</title>
		<link>http://www.swissarmylibrarian.net/2007/02/01/equal-access/#comment-20500</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swissarmylibrarian.net/?p=53#comment-20500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has always bothered me too. Moreover, our library has basically no policy on when to intervene if someone is looking at potentially objectionable content. It seems odd not to have a written policy about something so significant, and not having something explicit seems to contribute to the inconsistency because we never had to sit down and have a conversation about what that policy would say if it existed. At that point someone could have said something like your point about political and racist sites.

Does anyone else&#039;s library have a formal policy, and if so, what does it say?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has always bothered me too. Moreover, our library has basically no policy on when to intervene if someone is looking at potentially objectionable content. It seems odd not to have a written policy about something so significant, and not having something explicit seems to contribute to the inconsistency because we never had to sit down and have a conversation about what that policy would say if it existed. At that point someone could have said something like your point about political and racist sites.</p>
<p>Does anyone else&#8217;s library have a formal policy, and if so, what does it say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
