A little while ago, I got the idea to visually represent the official relationships that exist around a public library. Turns out, it was more involved than I thought, and the resulting figure wasn't what I initially conceived.
This came about during a conference I attended. I was thinking about library services, and why some good ideas get implemented while others don't, and why libraries offer some things that seem to be of no use to anyone. This started me down the path of getting to the root of "why" and "how," which I came to refer to as "What is Necessary" and "What is Possible."
The figure shown here is what I came up with (and evidence of my mad graphic design skills). The center triangle are the relationships between the public library (in blue, in the middle), the people we serve (on the top) and the people who serve us (on the bottom). The two big arrows on either side are the flow of needs and reality - somewhere in the middle the public library is trying to reconcile the two.
What is Necessary
Reading from the top down, the needs of our patrons are basically what drives everything that goes on in a library. Be it helping kids with homework, finding recipes, or preserving historical information for future generations, the needs of our patrons are What is Necessary for the library to provide.
To meet these needs, we can fall back on various groups that are in place to support the library (bottom of the triangle):
- if we need funding, we can request it from the various funding sources (state, local, Friends, etc.)
- if we need to alter library policy, we go to the Trustees
- if we need an improvement to the catalog or interlibrary loan service, we bring that up with the library network
- if we don't know how to deliver a particular service, we should be able to look to the wider library world of the State Library or various library associations for guidance
All of these groups are in place to serve the staff of a public library. Ideally, we tell them what we need in order to meet the requirements of our patrons, and they provide it.
What is Possible
But of course, we're not just handed everything we ask for:
- the realities of local and state funding place limits on our budget
- the wisdom of our Trustees keep library services in line with community values
- being part of a library network means my public library is one voice among many other cooperating libraries
- State Libraries and library associations can't always help, or aren't up-to-date with the latest software, vendors or services
It is the role of the library to take what we can get, and do the best we can with it to meet the needs of our patrons. Sometimes this means offering limited or abridged services, or services that sort of do what we want, but aren't ideal (i.e., the current state of downloadable audiobooks). But even by working within the constraints placed on us by the groups that support us, we should always strive to provide patrons with services tailored to meet their needs.
And then patrons tell us what their new needs are, and we go back down the chain, and the cycle continues.
The Public Library
In this model, the library is at the center of everything (leave it to a librarian to develop a bibliocentric view of life). I represented the public library on the triangle as both a single entity and also individual parts (I know libraries are more complex than this, but I was going for the basics). I did this because I see the same type of relationship structure within the library as without:
- the frontline desk staff works with patrons, so they often know best how effective library services are
- administration and support staff are consulted to change policies or procedures, and can be tasked with finding an appropriate tool to address a need
- the IT staff are generally the people who enforce reality, in terms of what is technically possible within the limits of the library
Regardless of how a need is first identified, it usually flows around these relationships until it is either implemented or abandoned.
So, What's the Point?
Not that any of this is rocket science, or isn't discernible by anyone else that works in a library. I think I did this as an exercise to illustrate patron-centricness. When it comes to library services, everything we offer should be addressing a need from "up the chain." Offering services just because we can, or because it's something being pushed on us from "below," doesn't justify that service. If a service doesn't address a patron need, then should we really be offering it?