Comments on: Book Due Date Calendar

By: http://print-xclusive.com

http://print-xclusive.com — Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:30:54 +0000

Really no matter if someone doesn’t know then its up to other people that they will help, so here it occurs.

By: Vickie

Vickie — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:06:40 +0000

Actually, Brian, in your library, they don’t even offer to print the receipt. Most patrons say they don’t want it anyway (except the few who use it as a bookmark.) Perhaps your patrons are very tech-savvy and log in to their account online to keep track of things.
As for the due date calendar, it is very cute, but I think it’s impractical. I don’t see many folks writing down all their titles & due dates – I wouldn’t, but then again, I am rather lazy.

By: Heather

Heather — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:56:59 +0000

I now miss the days of stamping books (even though it was before my time). You don’t know how many patrons I have to listen to complain because they lost the receipt, or argue because it was due this day and not that day. Stamping in the books would seem like a easier solution, also because I am a paper Nazi and I hate the way we go through trees!

By: Brian Herzog

Brian Herzog — Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:48:54 +0000

@Winnie: I don’t know if anyone has done a time study (actually, I’m sure someone has), but I think it probably is significantly faster. After finding and scanning the barcode, finding the place to stamp, inking the stamp and then stamping the book probably only adds 2-3 seconds to each transaction. However, add up those seconds from thousands of checkouts per day, and it becomes a difference of hours.

And even though a printer+paper is more expensive than stamp+ink, is probably cheaper than another staff person to make up for the extra time.

So, it does make sense for high-volume libraries or those who are short-staffed, but not necessarily for every library. Besides, I still lament the loss of the information (and ease for patrons) that you get with stamping.

Of course, there are also those patrons who love getting receipts because they consider it their built-in bookmark.

By: Winnie

Winnie — Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:16:40 +0000

I know we are considerd “old-fashioned” because we don’t use a receipt printer. How much faster is it to circ without stamping? And if the receipt printer is expensive is there any real saving. We have people come in who are so relieved that we stamp each book and then give us a rant about how stupid the receipts are.

By: Brian Herzog

Brian Herzog — Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:25:10 +0000

@Natasha: I know, them charging made me sad too.

@Winnie: When we switched to receipt printers, we stopped stamping due dates in the books. It lets the circ staff work faster, but it is a sad loss of information and history of the books. And obviously, sort of counter-productive if we try to save money by not printing receipts.

By: Winnie

Winnie — Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:32:42 +0000

Umm, we use a date stamp? And stamp each item with it’s due date? We use scrap paper for the date due slip, the last time we bought the stamps was in 2000 and the ink pads last just as long with re-inking. Does this solve the cost issue for the library and knowledge issue for the your patrons?

By: Natasha A.

Natasha A. — Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:34:06 +0000

That is very cool! You could laminate the pages so you could reuse!
I was sad when Library Elf decided to start charging for many of its previous free things